Filed: Sep. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-15093 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15093 _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-14022-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALEXANDER MICHAEL ROY, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A
Summary: Case: 12-15093 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-15093 _ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-14022-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALEXANDER MICHAEL ROY, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A m..
More
Case: 12-15093 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 12-15093 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 2:12-cr-14022-KMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ALEXANDER MICHAEL ROY, Defendant - Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, HULL, MARCUS, WILSON, PRYOR, MARTIN, JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the Case: 12-15093 Date Filed: 09/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2 judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc, IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
