Filed: Sep. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10430 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10430 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00052-RH-CAS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BEEJAY DUDLEY, a.k.a. BJ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 16, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10430 Date File
Summary: Case: 14-10430 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10430 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00052-RH-CAS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BEEJAY DUDLEY, a.k.a. BJ, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 16, 2014) Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10430 Date Filed..
More
Case: 14-10430 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10430
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00052-RH-CAS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BEEJAY DUDLEY,
a.k.a. BJ,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(September 16, 2014)
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10430 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Richard A. Greenberg, counsel for BeeJay Dudley in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dudley’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2