Filed: Sep. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10278 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10278 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00276-MMH-JBT-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN DAVID HART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 16, 2014) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Valarie Linnen, appointed couns
Summary: Case: 14-10278 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10278 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00276-MMH-JBT-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JONATHAN DAVID HART, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 16, 2014) Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Valarie Linnen, appointed counse..
More
Case: 14-10278 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10278
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. No. 3:10-cr-00276-MMH-JBT-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JONATHAN DAVID HART,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 16, 2014)
Before WILSON, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Valarie Linnen, appointed counsel for Jonathan David Hart in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
Case: 14-10278 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 2 of 2
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hart’s convictions and sentences
are AFFIRMED.
2