Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Jaques D. Randolph, 14-10941 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-10941 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 16, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10941 Date Filed: 09/16/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10941 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00565-RAL-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAQUES D. RANDOLPH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 16, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10941 D
More
           Case: 14-10941    Date Filed: 09/16/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-10941
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00565-RAL-EAJ-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JAQUES D. RANDOLPH,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (September 16, 2014)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN, and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-10941    Date Filed: 09/16/2014   Page: 2 of 2




      Thomas A. Burns, appointed counsel for Jaques Randolph in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Randolph’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer