Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10315 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00025-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID MICHAEL ARVELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 7, 2014) Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit
Summary: Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10315 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00025-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAVID MICHAEL ARVELO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (October 7, 2014) Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit J..
More
Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10315
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00025-MW-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DAVID MICHAEL ARVELO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(October 7, 2014)
Case: 14-10315 Date Filed: 10/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Before HULL, MARCUS and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for David Michael Arvelo, in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Arvelo’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2