Filed: Oct. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11245 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11245 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20827-UU-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO COX-CUELLAR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 28, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11245 Date
Summary: Case: 14-11245 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11245 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20827-UU-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO COX-CUELLAR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 28, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11245 Date ..
More
Case: 14-11245 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11245
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20827-UU-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ANTONIO COX-CUELLAR,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 28, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11245 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Alfredo Izaguirre, counsel for Jose Cox-Cuellar in this appeal, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Cox-Cuellar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2