Filed: Oct. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11555 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80208-KLR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAIWAN LENARD DRIVER, a.k.a. “Taiwan Martin,” Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 28, 2014) Before WILSON, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 14-11555 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11555 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80208-KLR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAIWAN LENARD DRIVER, a.k.a. “Taiwan Martin,” Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (October 28, 2014) Before WILSON, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
Case: 14-11555 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11555
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80208-KLR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAIWAN LENARD DRIVER,
a.k.a. “Taiwan Martin,”
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(October 28, 2014)
Before WILSON, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Cohen, appointed counsel for Taiwan Driver in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
Case: 14-11555 Date Filed: 10/28/2014 Page: 2 of 2
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Driver’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2