Filed: Oct. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11573 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11573 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00127-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SONNY MICHAEL VASQUEZ, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 30, 2014) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lynne M. Fleming
Summary: Case: 14-11573 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11573 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00127-WTM-GRS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus SONNY MICHAEL VASQUEZ, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (October 30, 2014) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Lynne M. Fleming,..
More
Case: 14-11573 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11573
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00127-WTM-GRS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SONNY MICHAEL VASQUEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(October 30, 2014)
Before HULL, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Lynne M. Fleming, appointed counsel for Sonny Michael Vasquez in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr.
Case: 14-11573 Date Filed: 10/30/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Vasquez and prepared a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Mr. Vasquez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2