Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10942 Date Filed: 11/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10942 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00549-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FERNANDO MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 3, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10942 Date F
Summary: Case: 14-10942 Date Filed: 11/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10942 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00549-JSM-TGW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FERNANDO MENDOZA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 3, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10942 Date Fi..
More
Case: 14-10942 Date Filed: 11/03/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10942
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00549-JSM-TGW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FERNANDO MENDOZA,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 3, 2014)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10942 Date Filed: 11/03/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Craig L. Crawford, appointed counsel for Fernando Mendoza in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Mendoza’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2