Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10431 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10431 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00077-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ALVARO MARTINEZ-PALOMARES, a.k.a. Ramon Gerardo Soldevilla Viera, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON,
Summary: Case: 14-10431 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10431 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00077-RH-CAS-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE ALVARO MARTINEZ-PALOMARES, a.k.a. Ramon Gerardo Soldevilla Viera, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, ..
More
Case: 14-10431 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10431
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 4:13-cr-00077-RH-CAS-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE ALVARO MARTINEZ-PALOMARES,
a.k.a. Ramon Gerardo Soldevilla Viera,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(November 5, 2014)
Before MARTIN, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-10431 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Gwendolyn Spivey, counsel for Jose Martinez-Palomares, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED,
and Martinez-Palomares’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2