Filed: Nov. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 12-12177 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12177 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00256-JA-GJK-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN HERIBERTO CARRILLO, a.k.a. Armando Cotto-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PE
Summary: Case: 12-12177 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-12177 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00256-JA-GJK-3 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUAN HERIBERTO CARRILLO, a.k.a. Armando Cotto-Ramos, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER..
More
Case: 12-12177 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 12-12177
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:11-cr-00256-JA-GJK-3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUAN HERIBERTO CARRILLO,
a.k.a. Armando Cotto-Ramos,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 5, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 12-12177 Date Filed: 11/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Roger Weeden, counsel for Juan Carrillo, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Carrillo’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2