Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13499 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00018-BAE-GRS-15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERVIN WALKER, JR., a.k.a. Ed, a.k.a. Fat, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (November 7, 2014) Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, J
Summary: Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13499 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00018-BAE-GRS-15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ERVIN WALKER, JR., a.k.a. Ed, a.k.a. Fat, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (November 7, 2014) Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2 Before HULL, JO..
More
Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13499
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:12-cr-00018-BAE-GRS-15
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ERVIN WALKER, JR.,
a.k.a. Ed,
a.k.a. Fat,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(November 7, 2014)
Case: 13-13499 Date Filed: 11/07/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Before HULL, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher E. Chapman, appointed counsel for Ervin Walker, Jr. in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Walker’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2