Filed: Nov. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11402 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11402 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00017-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE NACSE FREDERIC, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 17, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Barbara Sanders,
Summary: Case: 14-11402 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11402 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00017-MW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TYRONE NACSE FREDERIC, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (November 17, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Barbara Sanders, ..
More
Case: 14-11402 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11402
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00017-MW-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
TYRONE NACSE FREDERIC,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(November 17, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Barbara Sanders, appointed counsel for Tyrone Nacse Frederic in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Mr.
Case: 14-11402 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Frederic and prepared a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Mr. Frederic’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2