Filed: Nov. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11185 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11185 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00417-JSM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL T. RIVERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 17, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11185 Date
Summary: Case: 14-11185 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11185 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00417-JSM-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL T. RIVERS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 17, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11185 Date F..
More
Case: 14-11185 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11185
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00417-JSM-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL T. RIVERS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(November 17, 2014)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11185 Date Filed: 11/17/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Michael T. Rivers in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Rivers’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2