Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Eugene Spiker, 14-11679 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11679 Visitors: 67
Filed: Nov. 19, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11679 Date Filed: 11/19/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11679 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00127-MEW-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ROBERT EUGENE SPIKER, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (November 19, 2014) Before HULL, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11679 Date Fi
More
           Case: 14-11679    Date Filed: 11/19/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                      [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-11679
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00127-MEW-GRJ-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                            Plaintiff - Appellee,

                                   versus

ROBERT EUGENE SPIKER,

                                                         Defendant - Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (November 19, 2014)

Before HULL, MARTIN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11679     Date Filed: 11/19/2014    Page: 2 of 2


      Roland Falcon, appointed counsel for Robert Spiker, has moved to withdraw

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
(1967). Our independent review of the

entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Spiker’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer