Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Rosa Pineda Sanchez, 13-13815 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13815 Visitors: 80
Filed: Dec. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13815 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13815 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Rosie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13
More
           Case: 13-13815   Date Filed: 12/05/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-13815
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ,
a.k.a. Rosie,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Georgia
                      ________________________

                            (December 5, 2014)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-13815     Date Filed: 12/05/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Vernon Smith, appointed counsel for Rosa Pineda Sanchez in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sanchez’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer