Filed: Dec. 05, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13815 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13815 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Rosie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13
Summary: Case: 13-13815 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13815 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Rosie, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (December 5, 2014) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-138..
More
Case: 13-13815 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-13815
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00319-TCB-LTW-4
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROSA PINEDA SANCHEZ,
a.k.a. Rosie,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(December 5, 2014)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-13815 Date Filed: 12/05/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Vernon Smith, appointed counsel for Rosa Pineda Sanchez in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Sanchez’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2