Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Brandi Marie Cooper-Miller, 14-12225 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12225 Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12225 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12225 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDI MARIE COOPER-MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 22, 2014) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12225
More
           Case: 14-12225    Date Filed: 12/22/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-12225
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-12



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

BRANDI MARIE COOPER-MILLER,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (December 22, 2014)

Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12225     Date Filed: 12/22/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Daniel Daly, counsel for Brandi Cooper-Miller, has moved to withdraw

from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Cooper-Miller’s

conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer