Filed: Dec. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12225 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12225 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDI MARIE COOPER-MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 22, 2014) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12225
Summary: Case: 14-12225 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12225 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRANDI MARIE COOPER-MILLER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 22, 2014) Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12225 ..
More
Case: 14-12225 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12225
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00553-VMC-AEP-12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRANDI MARIE COOPER-MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 22, 2014)
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12225 Date Filed: 12/22/2014 Page: 2 of 2
Daniel Daly, counsel for Brandi Cooper-Miller, has moved to withdraw
from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Cooper-Miller’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2