Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Roginald Charles Smiley, 13-10823 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-10823 Visitors: 81
Filed: Dec. 30, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-10823 Date Filed: 12/30/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-10823 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00487-SCB-TBM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROGINALD CHARLES SMILEY, a.k.a. Reginald Charles Smiley, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 30, 2014) Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
More
            Case: 13-10823    Date Filed: 12/30/2014   Page: 1 of 2


                                                           [DO NOT PUBLISH]


             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 13-10823
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00487-SCB-TBM-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                    versus

ROGINALD CHARLES SMILEY,
a.k.a. Reginald Charles Smiley,

                                                           Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Florida
                      ________________________

                             (December 30, 2014)

Before MARTIN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-10823     Date Filed: 12/30/2014   Page: 2 of 2


      Mark W. Ciaravella, appointed counsel for Roginald Charles Smiley in this

direct criminal appeal, has filed a renewed motion to withdraw from further

representation of the appellant, supported by a brief filed pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because our

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Smiley’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer