Filed: Dec. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11087 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11087 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00120-VMC-TGW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRIAN E. SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 31, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Grady C. Irvin, Jr., a
Summary: Case: 14-11087 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11087 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00120-VMC-TGW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRIAN E. SIMMONS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (December 31, 2014) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Grady C. Irvin, Jr., ap..
More
Case: 14-11087 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11087
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cr-00120-VMC-TGW-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
BRIAN E. SIMMONS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(December 31, 2014)
Before WILLIAM PRYOR, JILL PRYOR and BLACK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Grady C. Irvin, Jr., appointed counsel for Brian E. Simmons in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
Case: 14-11087 Date Filed: 12/31/2014 Page: 2 of 2
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Simmons’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2