Filed: Jan. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12487 Date Filed: 01/12/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12487 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00073-SCB-EAJ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTIN MICHAEL JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 12, 2015) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins,
Summary: Case: 14-12487 Date Filed: 01/12/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12487 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00073-SCB-EAJ-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JUSTIN MICHAEL JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (January 12, 2015) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Meghan Ann Collins, ..
More
Case: 14-12487 Date Filed: 01/12/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12487
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:12-cr-00073-SCB-EAJ-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JUSTIN MICHAEL JOHNSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(January 12, 2015)
Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Justin Johnson in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of
Case: 14-12487 Date Filed: 01/12/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Johnson and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2