Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11551 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11551 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00031-WLS-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMONDEZ KEGLER, a.k.a. Ron, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (January 14, 2015) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11551 Dat
Summary: Case: 14-11551 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11551 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00031-WLS-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMONDEZ KEGLER, a.k.a. Ron, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (January 14, 2015) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11551 Date..
More
Case: 14-11551 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11551
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00031-WLS-TQL-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARMONDEZ KEGLER,
a.k.a. Ron,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(January 14, 2015)
Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11551 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Je’Nita N. Lane, appointed counsel for Armondez Kegler in this direct
criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of
Kegler, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record
reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.
Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of
merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kegler’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2