Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Armondez Kegler, 14-11551 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11551 Visitors: 35
Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11551 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11551 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00031-WLS-TQL-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARMONDEZ KEGLER, a.k.a. Ron, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (January 14, 2015) Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11551 Dat
More
           Case: 14-11551   Date Filed: 01/14/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-11551
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00031-WLS-TQL-2


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

ARMONDEZ KEGLER,
a.k.a. Ron,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                            (January 14, 2015)

Before MARCUS, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11551     Date Filed: 01/14/2015    Page: 2 of 2


      Je’Nita N. Lane, appointed counsel for Armondez Kegler in this direct

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation of

Kegler, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct.

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Kegler’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                           2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer