Filed: Jan. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12419 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12419 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80124-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER N. GANDOLFO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (January 14, 2015) Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12419 Dat
Summary: Case: 14-12419 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12419 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80124-DTKH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CHRISTOPHER N. GANDOLFO, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (January 14, 2015) Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-12419 Date..
More
Case: 14-12419 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12419
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80124-DTKH-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHRISTOPHER N. GANDOLFO,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(January 14, 2015)
Before JULIE CARNES, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12419 Date Filed: 01/14/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Randee J. Golder, appointed counsel for Christopher Gandolfo in this
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gandolfo’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2