Filed: Jan. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12077 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12077 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00026-ODE-AJB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PLAMEN ATANASOV, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (January 21, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mary Erickson, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 14-12077 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-12077 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00026-ODE-AJB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PLAMEN ATANASOV, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (January 21, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Mary Erickson, appointed couns..
More
Case: 14-12077 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-12077
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00026-ODE-AJB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PLAMEN ATANASOV,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
_________________________
(January 21, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Mary Erickson, appointed counsel for Plamen Atanasov in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
Case: 14-12077 Date Filed: 01/21/2015 Page: 2 of 2
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Atanasov’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2