Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Antwon Joshua Wesley, 14-12383 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-12383 Visitors: 51
Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12382 Date Filed: 01/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff -Appellee, versus ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 26, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CUR
More
           Case: 14-12382   Date Filed: 01/26/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                       Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

       D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                           Plaintiff -Appellee,

                                      versus

ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeals from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                      ________________________

                            (January 26, 2015)

Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-12382    Date Filed: 01/26/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Antwon Joshua Wesley, has

filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to

Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and the judgments revoking Wesley’s supervised release and

imposing his resulting sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer