Filed: Jan. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-12382 Date Filed: 01/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff -Appellee, versus ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 26, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CUR
Summary: Case: 14-12382 Date Filed: 01/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff -Appellee, versus ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (January 26, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURI..
More
Case: 14-12382 Date Filed: 01/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
Nos. 14-12382; 14-12383
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket Nos. 3:12-cr-00072-MCR-1; 3:13-cr-00091-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff -Appellee,
versus
ANTWON JOSHUA WESLEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(January 26, 2015)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-12382 Date Filed: 01/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Randolph P. Murrell, appointed counsel for Antwon Joshua Wesley, has
filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and the judgments revoking Wesley’s supervised release and
imposing his resulting sentences are AFFIRMED.
2