Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. George Evans Bivins, Jr., 14-11798 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11798 Visitors: 77
Filed: Jan. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11798 Date Filed: 01/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11798 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80034-KAM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GEORGE EVANS BIVINS, JR., a.k.a. Ziggy, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (January 28, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case:
More
           Case: 14-11798   Date Filed: 01/28/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-11798
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 9:13-cr-80034-KAM-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                     Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

GEORGE EVANS BIVINS, JR.,
a.k.a. Ziggy,

                                                     Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (January 28, 2015)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11798     Date Filed: 01/28/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Richard A. Serafini, appointed counsel for George Evans Bivins, Jr., in this

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bivins’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer