Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Leo McTear, Jr., 14-13192 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13192 Visitors: 112
Filed: Feb. 03, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13192 Date Filed: 02/03/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13192 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 7:14-cr-00001-HL-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LEO MCTEAR, JR., Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (February 3, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13192 Dat
More
            Case: 14-13192   Date Filed: 02/03/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



             IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                     FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                       ________________________

                             No. 14-13192
                         Non-Argument Calendar
                       ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 7:14-cr-00001-HL-TQL-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


                                                               Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                   versus

LEO MCTEAR, JR.,


                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                       ________________________

                Appeal from the United States District Court
                    for the Middle District of Georgia
                      ________________________

                             (February 3, 2015)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, MARCUS and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-13192     Date Filed: 02/03/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Rick D. Collum, appointed counsel for Leo McTear, Jr., has filed a motion

to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the

defendant’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer