Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Michael Ade Odukoya, 14-10238 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-10238 Visitors: 37
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10238 Date Filed: 02/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10238 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00513-AT-JFK-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ADE ODUKOYA, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (February 5, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-10238 Date Fil
More
           Case: 14-10238   Date Filed: 02/05/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                       [DO NOT PUBLISH]




            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-10238
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00513-AT-JFK-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

MICHAEL ADE ODUKOYA,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Northern District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                            (February 5, 2015)

Before TJOFLAT, JORDAN and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-10238     Date Filed: 02/05/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Jamila M. Hall, appointed counsel for Michael Odukoya in this criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
,

18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Odukoya’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer