Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-10171 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10171 Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00122-WS-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ALAN DICKENS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 13, 2015) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brandy Hambright, appo
Summary: Case: 14-10171 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-10171 Non-Argument Calendar _ D. C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00122-WS-C-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus MICHAEL ALAN DICKENS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama _ (March 13, 2015) Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Brandy Hambright, appoi..
More
Case: 14-10171 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-10171
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D. C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-00122-WS-C-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MICHAEL ALAN DICKENS,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Alabama
________________________
(March 13, 2015)
Before MARCUS, JULIE CARNES and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Brandy Hambright, appointed counsel for Michael Dickens, has moved to
withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a brief pursuant
Case: 14-10171 Date Filed: 03/13/2015 Page: 2 of 2
to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Dickens’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2