Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Shawn Peter Springer, 13-13559 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 13-13559 Visitors: 36
Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-13559 Date Filed: 03/20/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-13559 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00215-RCV-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SHAWN PETER SPRINGER, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (March 20, 2015) Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-13559 Date
More
           Case: 13-13559   Date Filed: 03/20/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 13-13559
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00215-RCV-GRJ-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

SHAWN PETER SPRINGER,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                            (March 20, 2015)

Before MARCUS, WILLIAM PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 13-13559     Date Filed: 03/20/2015    Page: 2 of 2


      Angela Wright, counsel for Shawn Springer, has moved to withdraw from

further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Springer’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer