Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 13-15405 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15405 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00024-CAR-CHW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (April 13, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15405 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 13-15405 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 13-15405 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00024-CAR-CHW-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIAM CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (April 13, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 13-15405 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 13-15405 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 13-15405
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00024-CAR-CHW-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM CAMPBELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(April 13, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 13-15405 Date Filed: 04/13/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Charles Brant, counsel for William Campbell, has moved to withdraw from
further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of
the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals
no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Campbell’s
convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.
2