Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13043 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH WAYNE KING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 16, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert B. Tuten and Mickey
Summary: Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13043 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH WAYNE KING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 16, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert B. Tuten and Mickey ..
More
Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13043
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSEPH WAYNE KING,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Alabama
________________________
(April 16, 2015)
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Robert B. Tuten and Mickey J. Gentle, appointed counsel for Joseph Wayne
King in this direct criminal appeal, have filed a motion to withdraw from further
representation of King, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 2 of 2
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and King’s conviction and sentence
are AFFIRMED.
2