Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Joseph Wayne King, 14-13043 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13043 Visitors: 26
Filed: Apr. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13043 Date Filed: 04/16/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13043 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSEPH WAYNE KING, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama _ (April 16, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Robert B. Tuten and Mickey
More
              Case: 14-13043    Date Filed: 04/16/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 14-13043
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                   D.C. Docket No. 5:12-cr-00457-RDP-TMP-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                      versus

JOSEPH WAYNE KING,

                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Northern District of Alabama
                          ________________________

                                 (April 16, 2015)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Robert B. Tuten and Mickey J. Gentle, appointed counsel for Joseph Wayne

King in this direct criminal appeal, have filed a motion to withdraw from further

representation of King, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
              Case: 14-13043    Date Filed: 04/16/2015   Page: 2 of 2


California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and King’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer