Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Nathaniel Green, 14-13475 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13475 Visitors: 92
Filed: Apr. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13475 Date Filed: 04/30/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13475 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00206-HES-MCR-10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus NATHANIEL GREEN, a.k.a. Nate, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (April 30, 2015) Before MARTIN, KRAVITCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13475 D
More
           Case: 14-13475   Date Filed: 04/30/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                     [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-13475
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 3:04-cr-00206-HES-MCR-10



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                 versus

NATHANIEL GREEN,
a.k.a. Nate,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                             (April 30, 2015)

Before MARTIN, KRAVITCH and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-13475    Date Filed: 04/30/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Susan Yazgi, appointed counsel for Nathaniel Green, has moved to

withdraw from further representation of Green and filed a brief pursuant to Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Green’s

supervised release and imposition of his sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer