Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Cedrick Williams, 14-13679 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13679 Visitors: 12
Filed: May 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13679 Date Filed: 05/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13679 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60167-WJZ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CEDRICK WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (May 8, 2015) Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Cedr
More
              Case: 14-13679   Date Filed: 05/08/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                            [DO NOT PUBLISH]



               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                       FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 14-13679
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 0:13-cr-60167-WJZ-1


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                     versus

CEDRICK WILLIAMS,

                                                            Defendant-Appellant.

                          ________________________

                  Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Southern District of Florida
                        ________________________

                                 (May 8, 2015)

Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Michael B. Cohen, counsel for Cedrick Williams in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams and filed a
              Case: 14-13679    Date Filed: 05/08/2015   Page: 2 of 2


brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no

arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Williams’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                        2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer