Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Lawrence Schechtman, 14-13778 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-13778 Visitors: 60
Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13778 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13778 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-40 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus LAWRENCE SCHECHTMAN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (June 2, 2015) Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-13778 Date File
More
           Case: 14-13778   Date Filed: 06/02/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-13778
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80106-KAM-40



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

LAWRENCE SCHECHTMAN,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Southern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (June 2, 2015)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-13778     Date Filed: 06/02/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Lawrence Schechtman in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Schechtman’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer