Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-13564 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13564 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00011-MTT-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LOPEZ-CHAMU, a.k.a. Jose Andres Lopez, a.k.a. Toro, a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamo, a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamu, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (June 2, 2015) Case:
Summary: Case: 14-13564 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-13564 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00011-MTT-CHW-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSE LOPEZ-CHAMU, a.k.a. Jose Andres Lopez, a.k.a. Toro, a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamo, a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamu, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (June 2, 2015) Case: 1..
More
Case: 14-13564 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-13564
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 5:14-cr-00011-MTT-CHW-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE LOPEZ-CHAMU,
a.k.a. Jose Andres Lopez,
a.k.a. Toro,
a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamo,
a.k.a. Jose Andres Chamu,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(June 2, 2015)
Case: 14-13564 Date Filed: 06/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Before MARTIN, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jose E. Guzman, appointed counsel for Jose Lopez-Chamu in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Lopez-Chamu’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2