Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14540 Date Filed: 06/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14540 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00122-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK WARD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2015) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for F
Summary: Case: 14-14540 Date Filed: 06/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14540 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00122-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK WARD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2015) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Fr..
More
Case: 14-14540 Date Filed: 06/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14540
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00122-RBD-DAB-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
FREDERICK WARD,
Defendant-Appellant.
__________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
_________________________
(June 4, 2015)
Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Frederick Ward in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed
a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
Case: 14-14540 Date Filed: 06/04/2015 Page: 2 of 2
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ward’s conviction and sentence are
AFFIRMED.
2