Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Frederick Ward, 14-14540 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-14540 Visitors: 122
Filed: Jun. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14540 Date Filed: 06/04/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14540 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00122-RBD-DAB-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus FREDERICK WARD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 4, 2015) Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for F
More
              Case: 14-14540    Date Filed: 06/04/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________

                                No. 14-14540
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                  D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00122-RBD-DAB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                          versus

FREDERICK WARD,
                                                              Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                        _________________________

                                  (June 4, 2015)

Before MARTIN, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Adeel Bashir, appointed counsel for Frederick Ward in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed

a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s
              Case: 14-14540     Date Filed: 06/04/2015   Page: 2 of 2


assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ward’s conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer