Filed: Jun. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11315 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00056-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 5, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed:
Summary: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11315 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00056-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 5, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: ..
More
Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-11315
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00056-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(June 5, 2015)
Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Joshua Douglas Taylor in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s convictions and sentences are
AFFIRMED.
2