Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Joshua Douglas Taylor, 14-11315 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-11315 Visitors: 79
Filed: Jun. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed: 06/05/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-11315 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00056-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 5, 2015) Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-11315 Date Filed:
More
           Case: 14-11315   Date Filed: 06/05/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-11315
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

                 D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00056-MCR-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

JOSHUA DOUGLAS TAYLOR,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Northern District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (June 5, 2015)

Before MARCUS, JORDAN and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-11315    Date Filed: 06/05/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Joshua Douglas Taylor in this appeal,

has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Taylor’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer