Filed: Jun. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15385 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00083-GAP-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JAMES MCKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 8, 2015) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/
Summary: Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15385 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00083-GAP-KRS-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus WILLIE JAMES MCKNIGHT, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 8, 2015) Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/0..
More
Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/08/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15385
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 6:14-cr-00083-GAP-KRS-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIE JAMES MCKNIGHT,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 8, 2015)
Before HULL, JORDAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15385 Date Filed: 06/08/2015 Page: 2 of 2
H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Willie McKnight in this criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and McKnight’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2