Filed: Jun. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-16093 Date Filed: 06/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-16093 _ D. C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00066-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN L. YATES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 10, 2015) ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before JORDAN, DUBINA, and BALDOCK, * Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Honorable Bobb
Summary: Case: 11-16093 Date Filed: 06/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-16093 _ D. C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00066-JES-SPC-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOHN L. YATES, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 10, 2015) ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT Before JORDAN, DUBINA, and BALDOCK, * Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Honorable Bobby..
More
Case: 11-16093 Date Filed: 06/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 11-16093
_____________
D. C. Docket No. 2:10-cr-00066-JES-SPC-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOHN L. YATES,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
______________
(June 10, 2015)
ON REMAND FROM THE
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before JORDAN, DUBINA, and BALDOCK, * Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
*
Honorable Bobby R. Baldock, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, sitting
by designation.
Case: 11-16093 Date Filed: 06/10/2015 Page: 2 of 2
In light of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Yates v. United States, 135 S.
Ct. 1074 (2015), we vacate John Yates’s convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1519 and
affirm Mr. Yates’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2232. We reinstate all but Part
IV.B of our prior opinion, reported at
733 F.3d 1059 (11th Cir. 2013), and remand
this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme
Court’s opinion.
AFFIRMED in part, VACATED and REMANDED, in part.
2