Filed: Jun. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14361 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00255-TWT-RGV-8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK POWELL, a.k.a. Carlos Dawson, a.k.a. Dip, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (June 15, 2015) Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOF
Summary: Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14361 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00255-TWT-RGV-8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DERRICK POWELL, a.k.a. Carlos Dawson, a.k.a. Dip, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (June 15, 2015) Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before TJOFL..
More
Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14361
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:11-cr-00255-TWT-RGV-8
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DERRICK POWELL,
a.k.a. Carlos Dawson,
a.k.a. Dip,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(June 15, 2015)
Case: 14-14361 Date Filed: 06/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
David H. Jones, appointed counsel for Derrick Powell in this criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Powell’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2