Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Bradford Ford, 14-14995 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-14995 Visitors: 79
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14995 Date Filed: 06/24/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14995 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00008-CDL-MSH-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus BRADFORD FORD, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (June 24, 2015) Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14995 Date Filed: 06/
More
           Case: 14-14995   Date Filed: 06/24/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                        [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-14995
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

               D.C. Docket No. 4:14-cr-00008-CDL-MSH-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

BRADFORD FORD,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Georgia
                     ________________________

                             (June 24, 2015)

Before HULL, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-14995     Date Filed: 06/24/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      David L. Roberts, appointed counsel for Bradford Ford, has filed a motion to

withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.

California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent

review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of

the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals

no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and

Ford’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                          2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer