Filed: Jun. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14454 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-WS-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES RAY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Jason Felix, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 26, 2015) Before: HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:
Summary: Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14454 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-WS-GRJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JAMES RAY WILLIAMS, a.k.a. Jason Felix, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (June 26, 2015) Before: HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: ..
More
Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14454
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:12-cr-00006-WS-GRJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JAMES RAY WILLIAMS,
a.k.a. Jason Felix,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Florida
________________________
(June 26, 2015)
Before: HULL, WILLIAM PRYOR, and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-14454 Date Filed: 06/26/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Barbara Sanders, appointed counsel for James Ray Williams in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Williams
and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Williams’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2