Filed: Jul. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14280 Date Filed: 07/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14280 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00084-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAMALA TAMARA HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 2, 2015) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14280 Date F
Summary: Case: 14-14280 Date Filed: 07/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14280 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00084-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAMALA TAMARA HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 2, 2015) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14280 Date Fi..
More
Case: 14-14280 Date Filed: 07/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-14280
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00084-MMH-MCR-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TAMALA TAMARA HAMMOND,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 2, 2015)
Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-14280 Date Filed: 07/02/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Tamala Tamara Hammond in
this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment revoking
Hammond’s probation and her resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.
2