Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Tamala Tamara Hammond, 14-14280 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 14-14280 Visitors: 90
Filed: Jul. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-14280 Date Filed: 07/02/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-14280 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00084-MMH-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus TAMALA TAMARA HAMMOND, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 2, 2015) Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-14280 Date F
More
           Case: 14-14280   Date Filed: 07/02/2015   Page: 1 of 2


                                                         [DO NOT PUBLISH]



            IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                    FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                      ________________________

                            No. 14-14280
                        Non-Argument Calendar
                      ________________________

              D.C. Docket No. 3:13-cr-00084-MMH-MCR-1



UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                              Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                  versus

TAMALA TAMARA HAMMOND,

                                                         Defendant-Appellant.

                      ________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court
                   for the Middle District of Florida
                     ________________________

                              (July 2, 2015)

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
              Case: 14-14280     Date Filed: 07/02/2015   Page: 2 of 2


      Meghan Ann Collins, appointed counsel for Tamala Tamara Hammond in

this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
(1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the judgment revoking

Hammond’s probation and her resulting sentence are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer