Filed: Jul. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15366 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20873-UU-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND COLON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 15, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS, and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/1
Summary: Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15366 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20873-UU-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RAYMOND COLON, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 15, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS, and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/15..
More
Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15366
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:13-cr-20873-UU-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RAYMOND COLON,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(July 15, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, MARCUS, and WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15366 Date Filed: 07/15/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Richard L. Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Raymond Colon in this direct
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Colon’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2