Filed: Jul. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 07/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10560 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:95-cr-08043-DTKH-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RALPHE POIDEVIEN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 17, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 0
Summary: Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 07/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10560 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:95-cr-08043-DTKH-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RALPHE POIDEVIEN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 17, 2015) Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 07..
More
Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 07/17/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10560
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:95-cr-08043-DTKH-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RALPHE POIDEVIEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(July 17, 2015)
Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and JULIE CARNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 15-10560 Date Filed: 07/17/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Robert Adler, appointed counsel for Ralphe Poidevien, has filed a motion to
withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Poidevien has
filed a motion for leave to file a response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and
Anders brief out of time. Poidevien’s motion is GRANTED, however, our
independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the
relative merit of the appeal is correct. Therefore, because independent examination
of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to
withdraw is GRANTED, and the denial of Poidevien’s motion to reduce sentence,
filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), is AFFIRMED. Furthermore, in light of
the foregoing, Poidevien’s motion to dismiss appointed counsel, grant him leave to
proceed on appeal pro se, and to be provided with a copy of the record on appeal is
DENIED AS MOOT.
2