Filed: Jul. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 07/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15162 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:96-cr-00027-DHB-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEROME FRIERSON-BEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 23, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 0
Summary: Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 07/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15162 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:96-cr-00027-DHB-BKE-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEROME FRIERSON-BEY, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia _ (July 23, 2015) Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 07..
More
Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 07/23/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15162
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:96-cr-00027-DHB-BKE-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEROME FRIERSON-BEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Georgia
________________________
(July 23, 2015)
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15162 Date Filed: 07/23/2015 Page: 2 of 2
John E. Price, appointed counsel for Jerome Frierson-Bey in this criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s revocation
judgment is AFFIRMED.
2