Filed: Jul. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: Case: 15-10275 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10275 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00191-TJC-JBT-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY CAMERON, a.k.a. Isidro Rodriguez, a.k.a. Baldhead, a.k.a. Tony, a.k.a. Heathcliff, a.k.a. T, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 28, 2015) Case: 15-1027
Summary: Case: 15-10275 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10275 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00191-TJC-JBT-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ANTHONY CAMERON, a.k.a. Isidro Rodriguez, a.k.a. Baldhead, a.k.a. Tony, a.k.a. Heathcliff, a.k.a. T, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (July 28, 2015) Case: 15-10275..
More
Case: 15-10275 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10275
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 3:12-cr-00191-TJC-JBT-2
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY CAMERON,
a.k.a. Isidro Rodriguez,
a.k.a. Baldhead,
a.k.a. Tony,
a.k.a. Heathcliff,
a.k.a. T,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(July 28, 2015)
Case: 15-10275 Date Filed: 07/28/2015 Page: 2 of 2
Before HULL, MARCUS and ROSENBAUM, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Eric Roper, appointed counsel for Anthony Cameron in this
criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire
record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is
correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable
issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cameron’s
conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2