Filed: Aug. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 14-15446 Date Filed: 08/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15446 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00003-WLS-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK M. ENGLISH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 10, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-1
Summary: Case: 14-15446 Date Filed: 08/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 14-15446 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00003-WLS-TQL-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus PATRICK M. ENGLISH, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia _ (August 10, 2015) Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Case: 14-15..
More
Case: 14-15446 Date Filed: 08/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 14-15446
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00003-WLS-TQL-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
PATRICK M. ENGLISH,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Georgia
________________________
(August 10, 2015)
Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, JORDAN and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Case: 14-15446 Date Filed: 08/10/2015 Page: 2 of 2
D. Nicole Williams, appointed counsel for Patrick M. English in this appeal,
has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has filed a
brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d
493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s
assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent
examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s
motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and English’s conviction and sentence is
AFFIRMED.
2