Filed: Sep. 10, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-10029 Date Filed: 09/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10029 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00370-WSD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GLENNY DIFO, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (September 10, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Esther Panitch, appointed
Summary: Case: 15-10029 Date Filed: 09/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 15-10029 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00370-WSD-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus GLENNY DIFO, Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia _ (September 10, 2015) Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Esther Panitch, appointed c..
More
Case: 15-10029 Date Filed: 09/10/2015 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 15-10029
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00370-WSD-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GLENNY DIFO,
Defendant - Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Georgia
________________________
(September 10, 2015)
Before JORDAN, ROSENBAUM, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Esther Panitch, appointed counsel for Glenny Difo in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and has
Case: 15-10029 Date Filed: 09/10/2015 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967).
Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of
the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the
entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is
GRANTED, and Difo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2